Showing posts with label Classical vs Contemporary Fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Classical vs Contemporary Fiction. Show all posts

Sunday, February 12, 2017

The Scholarly Fangirl

College is full of memorable experiences. I remember one particular day when I was sitting in senior seminar, a prep class for graduating students in the Humanities Department, when two of my friends got into a debate about literature. While it may not sound atypical, this particular topic got heated quite quickly. One of my friends argued for the importance of teaching classical literature, like Shakespeare, and the other argued that contemporary novels, like young adult fiction, would become the new classics.

Although the debate quickly became passionate, the two made it up to each other before the end of the semester. Another of my friends even wrote a play for creative writing based off the encounter. The main problem I had while listening to it all was that I agreed with both of them. I’m a classicist in that I like sitting down with a book that challenges me intellectually. But I’m also a fangirl who enjoys books that make me laugh, cry, and want to throw the book against the wall.


Once upon a time, I didn’t like Shakespeare. He’s seen as the patriarch of English literature and the standard for most writers to ascribe too. I wondered, how can anybody live up to such a title? And how could one person have so much influence over literature while other writers are considered lesser?

Eventually, over the course of my undergraduate, I came to appreciate and enjoy Shakespeare’s plays and poetry, though I still don’t consider him the greatest writer known to mankind. I even came to have favorite plays, having written a paper on As You Like It. Throughout my college career, I came to learn a lot about my reading preferences.

The intellectual in me thoroughly enjoys studying literature, especially if it’s more difficult to read. I like discussions about literary tropes and trends in styles. In fact, that’s one of the reasons I started this blog—to express my thoughts on books and encourage discussions. I like to learn, to expand my mind, to grow. Reading challenging literature does just that.

When I was studying for my M.A. in English Literature, I spent a lot of time studying Middle English (think Shakespeare). A. LOT. So much so that when I decided to watch The Hollow Crown: War of the Roses for FUN. Part of the way through Henry VI, Part 1, I found that I could understand nearly everything they were saying. When I first started reading Shakespeare’s plays, I had to look up everything on SparkNotes and really analyze the text. Now I have little problem with it.

That doesn’t mean I don’t have difficulties. I still have to study the plot and characters to fully grasp them. Sure, sometimes I even have to look up some of the lesser-known phrases. But I find hearing language or reading the text presents few challenges. And understanding, whether historical or linguistic, makes literature far more enjoyable.

Perhaps that’s what it means to be a master at something: overcoming learning challenges to discover how to enjoy a text.

I mean, can a scholar really enjoy studying a Hamlet with the same relish as a teenager fangirls over The Hunger Games?

Yes.

Why not?

While the response towards the text may be different, there’s no rule saying that scholars can’t enjoy their work. I never would have pursued a degree in English literature if I didn’t enjoy reading it. Of course, literature often makes me think, but there are some instances when it makes me feel too, and more than just boredom. Richard III, A Modest Proposal, and The Telltale Heart made me shudder.

On the other hand, there are times when I’m tired from a long day, or a long semester, and I want to be swept away by a story instead of being encouraged to think. It’s these moments when the fangirl in me will pick up a young adult novel and connect with the characters and the story.

But that isn’t to say that I don’t learn. Sometimes a story will have a particularly interesting writing style or character development that I’ll note for my own writing. Or a story’s theme may inspire or challenge me. Or maybe a novel just moved me with every single aspect—the plot, the characters, the voice, the research, the theme—that I want to rush out and by myself a copy if I don’t already have one.

These types of books tend to be commercial instead of literary. But that isn’t to say that they don’t have literary value. A book that brings me to tears—or close to it—while it may not have the heavy descriptions typical of “literary” books, can still impress value through theme or other details. 

The Book Thief (historical fiction) is classified as young adult, but it’s also poetically profound with the way it values life and friendships. 

Illuminae (sci-fi) is another YA novel but with a unique writing style, told through chats, video feeds, and AI data. But the dedication of the characters towards the pursuit and exposure of the truth is astounding.

Inkheart (fantasy), the start of a YA trilogy, explores the importance of place and the value of words.

Now that I’ve finished my schooling in English and literature, I’ve started picking up books like Moby-Dick because I can’t resist a good intellectual challenge. But that’s not to say that I don’t enjoy YA books. I’ve read perhaps ten while I’m in the process of getting through this whale-obsessed narrative/study. Next time, I may pick up a less dense classic.

Until then, I will push through.

And just because I’m not technically a young adult (ages 13-18), doesn’t mean I will stop reading and writing YA.

As an intellectual, I will learn about cultures and histories, languages and sciences.

As a fangirl, I will laugh and stress with characters, turning pages late into the night.

Of course, the best books—whether classic or contemporary—encourage both.

***


Literary references: William Shakespeare’s As You Like It; Henry VI, Part 1; Hamlet; and Richard III; Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games; Jonathan Swift’s A Modest Proposal; Edgar Allen Poe’s The Telltale Heart; Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief; Amie Kaufman and Jay Kristoff’s Illuminae; Cornelia Funke’s Inkheart; and Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick.

Do you consider yourself more of a scholar or a fangirl? What’s your favorite genre? Why? 

Sunday, February 14, 2016

3 Reasons I Don't Read Romance Novels

No, this isn’t your typical Valentine’s Day post. First off, let me clarify that I have nothing against romance. Sometimes I may actually find myself shipping characters. But most of the time, I try to avoid strictly romantic novels because I’m not so much interested in the gushy love as I am the actual relationships between characters whether romantic or not.

Secondly, allow me to clarify what I mean by romance novels. I’m not referring to the literary term romance novels, a type of prose that we would associate with adventure today (eg. Le Morte Darthur). By romance novels, I mean the popular term referring to novels centered on two characters who fall in love. Here are just a few of the reasons I don’t prefer to read this type of romance:



1) Predictability.

I find romance novels predictable because they all progress the same way and have two different endings: the couple gets together or one/both of them die. Because of this predictability, there are many restrictions for the genre. Because of spoilers, I will refrain from listing a bunch of examples, but the stereotype I would say is Romeo and Juliet.

Some other genres, however, do not act this way. Historical fiction, for example, can have several different kinds of plots and subplots, and mystery deals specifically with the unpredictable and little details. Generally speaking, when I’m looking for a good book to read, I prefer something that will not just make me feel something but also make me think.

John Green’s The Fault in Our Stars is an exception to this point. While some of its aspects are predictable, and self-consciously so, it made me think on life, relationships, and mortality. If an author, like Green, can acknowledge predictability and handle it in a way that still moves and audience, I’ll probably enjoy the book.

2) Sentimentality.

Said in my best Sherlock impression: “Sentiment.”

If there’s anything that annoys me more than a boring book, it’s one that appeals so much to feelings that it’s not only un-relatable but also unrealistic. I could compare my general dislike for romantic sentimentality to my original dislike for musicals. You know the kind, where the whole story comes to a complete stop for the characters to sing a dramatic song that has absolutely nothing to do with the plot. It’s moments like these I would roll my eyes and just say, “Okay. I get it. Can we please get back to the story!”

I’m not a big fan of gushy, feel-good types of stories. And while I can sometimes tolerate a kissing scene, full out make out sessions between characters are annoying, and sex scenes are a complete turn off. I have stopped reading several books, including some historical fiction novels, for the latter reason.

3) Popularity.

And a very pretty copy it is!
Romance novels tend to be popular, not literary fiction. Notice how I wrote TEND not ARE. Yes, you have books like Jane Eyre and Pride and Prejudice. (I have yet to read the latter. Don’t worry, it’s on my list. It has to be. I own a copy. See right.) But many, not all, romance novels today tend to lack the literary qualities that I enjoy so much. Instead, they attempt to appeal to a wider audience for the sake of popularity.

And just because everybody else is reading a novel is not a great reason I should. While there are plenty of bestselling authors whose books I have not read, there are many fantastic authors whose books I thoroughly enjoy but nobody has heard of. This is not to say that I prefer the obscure, but there’s something charming about having read a book without an overwhelming fandom. You don’t get all the drama. Of course, that won’t stop me from trying to recommend unknown books to all my friends.

***

Sure, I enjoy a well-written romantic subplot. In fact, whenever the romance doesn’t dominate the plot, I find myself enjoying the relationships and will actually ship characters. Some great examples include The Scorpio Races and The Alliance Series. When an author first gets me to care about the characters, then I’ll care about the romances between them.

I’ve heard it said that the biggest romantics are those who deny they’re romantics at all. Whether this post says anything about me, I’ll let you decide. Despite all my rantings, I don’t have anything against romance in a story. I just don’t think it should be the main focus. Personally, I prefer YA adventure, mysteries, and all sorts of fantasy.

Just like the historical fiction fan may find it difficult to enjoy a sci-fi novel, so the swashbuckling adventurer in me has a hard time enjoying romantic-centered books. Perhaps that’s why I enjoy The Princess Bride so much. The book has a little bit of everything—humor, swordfights, logic, betrayal—and yeah, I guess the romance isn’t so bad after all.

What’s YOUR favorite genre to read? What are some of the books you’ve read with well-written romantic subplots? And for the sake of Valentine’s day, who’s your favorite fictional couple?

Literary references: Sir Thomas Malory’s Le Morte Darthur, William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, John Green’s The Fault in Our Stars, Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre, Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, Maggie Stiefvater’s The Scorpio Races, L. Nicodemus Lyon’s The Alliance Series, and William Goldman’s The Princess Bride.